Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: eric <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:48:37 -0500
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:18:08 +0000, jc wrote:
> Shant M wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you, those are three excellent points.
>>
>
> Don't get me wrong, he's a good player. He's just not a leadoff hitter,
> and probably not a CF either. Not to mention, his arm is as bad, if not
> worse, than Damon's, he doesn't take the amount of pitches that Damon
> does, and Damon is a much better baserunner. So when you factor in that
> the Yankees didn't have to give up any prospects to get him, I think
> that the Yanks got a much better deal than the Sox did with Crisp, even
> though they had to overpay by a few mil.
Compare Damon's away splits to Crisp's. It isn't even close. Crisp had
more BB than Damon and a higher OBP on the road.
Damon benefitted hugely from Fenway while Crisp was hurt by Jacob's.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: slatconsulting
- Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: eric
- Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: jc
- Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: Shant M
- Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- From: jc
- Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- Prev by Date: Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- Next by Date: Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- Previous by thread: Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- Next by thread: Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
