Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Seth Jackson <a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:43:47 GMT
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:49:58 -0500, "V-Man" <Vincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> There was no reason to sign a backup infielder at all when we already
>> had a major league-ready prospect we acquired in the Womack trade.
>> What was the point of getting Howard if we're not going to give him a
>> chance?
>>
>
>Serious question: Why waste a million in salary on a not-so-hot backup when
>Howard is available?
I don't know, other than it's the Yankee way to ignore young players
in favor of mediocre, aging Proven Veterans(tm). I had my hopes up
that they were going to change their attitude with the new Brian
Cashman regime, but apparently not.
>I have to admit, I based a lot of my opinion of Cairo
>on his 2004 season. Was it an aberration or did he "thrive" in pinstripes?
>Looking at his career stats, I'm damned glad he is JUST a backup!
Aberration, most likely. And he's not getting any younger.
.
- References:
- Cairo's a Yank
- From: Steven
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Dewey
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: harry lime
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Tom K
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: V-Man
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Erasmus \"The Mannequin\" Brown
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: V-Man
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Seth Jackson
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: V-Man
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: Seth Jackson
- Re: Cairo's a Yank
- From: V-Man
- Cairo's a Yank
- Prev by Date: Re: 1939 Yankees; Question
- Next by Date: Re: BP article - Breakout Prospects
- Previous by thread: Re: Cairo's a Yank
- Next by thread: Re: Cairo's a Yank
- Index(es):