Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Ruben Safir <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:18:19 -0400, Tio Abogado® wrote:
But he's still worth more as a catcher relative to other catchers than
he would be as a first basemen, relative to other first basemen.
Piazza had a HoF bat regardless on where he hit.
He's a much stronger selection as a catcher, as arguably the greatest
hitter ever at that position. As a first baseman, he might still be a
viable candidate, but his career numbers don't begin to approach the
likes of a Gehrig or a Musial.
Yeah - that would be sad - ROFL!
There
have been other first basemen who've hit like Piazza. As a catcher,
he was unique.
As the second coming of Stan the Man he'd had been unique and MORE
valuable.
Not too many, and if he wasn't catching he'd have likey been better.
That's speculative at best. He certainly didn't hit any better after
he switched positions.
It was too late the game for that. His knees were all but shot.
That's
what made Mike Piazza so special as a player -- it would be damned
near impossible to find another player this side of Joe Mauer who
could reproduce what he did behind the plate.
What sucked about Piazza was that we lost 3 or 4 extra years of 145+
OPS seasons, and maybe a thousand at bats within the seasons he did
play, because he couldn't be moved from behind the plate.
Whether he should have been catching is a different argument, and one
that's ultimately irrelevant to this issue.
Not at all, it is essential to the issue.
No, it's not, and I'm not going off on that tangent, so save your
breath.
While he was
catching, he was an extremely valuable commodity, and the fact that he
was such an extraordinarily good hitter for that position
unquestionably enhanced his value.
Unquestionably? Hardly. I'm certain that if Piazza had been at 1st
base instead of catcher he would have had multiple more seasons hitting
360, 40, 620 slugging.
Yes - Unquestionable. He'd have nearly 600 HRs, a lifetime 630 slugging
and had created hundreds of more runs. In fact, he'd likely still be
playing where is value as a player at the moment is zero. Do you think
moving Joe Torre was a good move?
You're just pulling stuff out of thin air now. I'm not interested in
speculation about what Piazza might have done as a first baseman in some
alternate reality. The actual numbers that he did put up were worth
more coming from a catcher than they'd be worth coming from a first
baseman, and that's what positional value is all about. I realize
that you still don't get the concept and that you probably never will,
so I'm done talking about it.
Its not pulling numbers out of the sky to know that Piazza had a typical
career curve for a catcher and as a 1st baseman he'd had almost
definitely had a longer career.
Ruben
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Uncle AbogadoŽ
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- References:
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: O'Bob
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Darren Delgado
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: jonathan
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Darren Delgado
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Tio AbogadoŽ
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Tio AbogadoŽ
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- From: Tio AbogadoŽ
- Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- Next by Date: Re: When Beltran Returns
- Previous by thread: Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- Next by thread: Re: Yeah......Right!!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|