Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: tmp <tmp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:29:01 -0500
Ruben Safir wrote:
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:30:45 -0500, tmp wrote:
NO! Who would. But I don't want Bay signed for 6 years either.Well, get ready to watch Angel next year then...
harlan
I'm not worried about next year. I'm worried about the long term future
of this team.
All we got is one year at a time.
It's clear by now that this Mets organization is not capable of running
the kind of baseball operation that most of us would like to see - with
a strong minor league organization, a focus on teaching baseball
fundamentals, good scouting and drafting, etc.
There's nothing I'd like to see more than some kind of long term plan.
But it ain't happening with this bunch.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- References:
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Optimus Prime
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Jimmy
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: tmp
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: tmp
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Ruben Safir
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Prev by Date: I remember Ruby the Kniish Man...
- Next by Date: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Previous by thread: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Next by thread: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Index(es):