Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: tmp <tmp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:49:22 -0500
Harlan Lachman wrote:
In article <26441-4B2BA907-6176@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
JerseyDevil65@xxxxxxxxx (Jimmy) wrote:
I'm not sure the Mets have to go to 5 years. Theres talk of a mystery
team, but that might be crap put out by Bay's agent to get the Mets to
bid against themselves.
Bay is not Vlad Guerro (sic) in his prime, Arod, or even Delgado when he
was younger.
Frankly, since one guy who is not a pitcher will not make this team
better than the Phils anyway, I would hope Minaya holds firm and
eliminates yet another mistake that someone else will have to clean up.
harlan
The pitching problems aside, they could really use Bay in the lineup.
He's a solid major league hitter. Certainly way better than anyone else
they'll be able to scrounge up to play left field.
I know he'll be 31 next year and all that, but do you really want to
watch Angel Pagan play left? That is, for the 6 weeks when he actually
won't be on the DL.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- References:
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Optimus Prime
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Jimmy
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Prev by Date: Re: ot-funny x-mas page
- Next by Date: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Previous by thread: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Next by thread: Re: Mets thinking about a fifth year for Bay
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|