Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- From: Matt <matttelles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:26:40 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 2, 8:47 pm, Ruben <ru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:44:55 -0800, Matt wrote:
On Nov 2, 5:12 pm, Ruben <ru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This guy was a leathal bat and evidently couldn't field although I don't
know why he has the missed season (maybe WWi?)
Played some of his best years in Brooklyn...
Doesn't seem clear, although it appears he played in the minors.
A pretty good article about him here:
http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&pid=4635&bid=1389
Matt
Just to point out just how great of a hitter he was, 4 times he hit over
160 OPS+, including three years in a row in Brooklyn. Evidently from the
Article, he was swinging for the fences in the dead ball era, putting him
in conflict with the hitting coaches :)
Makes you seriously wonder why so many teams gave up on him. Too much
money? Bad attitude? His fielding didn't appear to be bad, so I have
to
wonder...
Matt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- From: Ruben
- Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- References:
- Baseball History Lesson of the day
- From: Ruben
- Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- From: Matt
- Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- From: Ruben
- Baseball History Lesson of the day
- Prev by Date: Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- Next by Date: Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- Previous by thread: Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- Next by thread: Re: Baseball History Lesson of the day
- Index(es):