Is he Gene or Dean? was, Re: Rueben is a weener
- From: Phil <phil@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:00:11 -0400
On 2009-03-23 16:29:00 -0400, "Mr. and Mr. Boen" <JohnAndBillBoen@xxxxxxxxx> said:
On Mar 23, 4:19 pm, El Abogado Que Delira Ha Vuelto®
<siempredelira...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:18:49 -0400, Phil <p...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 2009-03-23 10:19:14 -0400, Ruben <ru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:17:03 -0400, Phil wrote:
-- EAQDEU®
26*!! 26*!! 26*!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- We would appreciate it if people wouldn't change the Subject name of these posts.
- From: Mr. and Mr. Boen
- You must be joking, right?
- From: Element
- I see I was late for this game. Good thing asbnym users are on the uptick this this new kind of troll. Maybe we should all just use the subject headers to talk baseball for a few months. -- Ruben
- From: Ruben
- Why?
- From: Phil
- If your going to ask a question you can at least not top post and quote the segment that you posing a question about....DUH --- Ruben
- From: Ruben
- Does posting a reply in the subject line constitute top-posting? I'm terribly sorry; I was not considering the feelings of my fellow newsgroup members when I did that, and again, you have my deepest apologies. I'll try to do better next time.
- From: Phil
- <<Re: Does posting a reply in the subject line constitute top-posting? I'm terribly sorry; I was not considering the feelings of my fellow newsgroup members when I did that, and again, you have my deepest apologies. I'll try to do better next time.>> IT's OK Phil - I just didn't know what your post refered to, -- Ruben
- From: Ruben
- Re: <<Re: Does posting a reply in the subject line constitute top-posting? I'm terribly sorry; I was not considering the feelings of my fellow newsgroup members when I did that, and again, you have my deepest apologies. I'll try to do better next time.>> IT's OK Phil - I just didn't know what your post refered to, -- Ruben --- You the man, Ruben. Phil
- From: Phil
- I don't know but it's definitely bad posting form and makes it very difficult to follow a thread. I really wish you guys would knock it off because I have a whole bunch of other completely trivial things to complain about and now I've completely forgotten what they were. Re: <<Re: Does posting a reply in the subject line constitute top-posting? I'm terribly sorry; I was not considering the feelings of my fellow newsgroup members when I did that, and again, you have my deepest apologies. I'll try to do better next time.>> IT's OK Phil - I just didn't know what your post refered to, -- Ruben --- You the man, Ruben. Phil
- From: El Abogado Que Delira Ha Vuelto®
- Rueben is a weener
- From: Mr. and Mr. Boen
- We would appreciate it if people wouldn't change the Subject name of these posts.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why aren't Tom Seaver and Dave Kingman still part of the Mets ...
- Next by Date: Evildoer. (Was Re: Not to top-post or anything, but you're just saying that because you're an effete urban East-coast metrosexual latté-sipper, while I've been playing and coaching baseball at a moderately high level for several years -- was: Re: I don't know but it's definitely bad posting form and makes it very difficult to follow a thread. I really wish you guys would knock it off because I have a whole bunch of other completely trivial things to complain about and now I've completely forgotten what they were. Re: <<Re: Does posting a reply in the subject line constitute top-posting? I'm terribly sorry; I was not considering the feelings of my fellow newsgroup members when I did that, and again, you have my deepest apologies. I'll try to do better next time.>> IT's OK Phil - I just didn't know what your post refered to, -- Ruben --- You the man, Ruben. Phil)
- Previous by thread: Rueben is a weener
- Next by thread: Freeze Tag - Your it! --- Now you have me top posting: Re: Is he Gene or Dean? was, Re: Rueben is a weener
- Index(es):
