Re: Okay, a serious question about something stupid...
- From: "Micheal Ray" <mrr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:08:33 -0400
"El Abogado Que Delira En Usenet®" <siempredelirando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:1poj739a3dmserbat75ugs6otikq1vtsv5@xxxxxxxxxx
[Default] On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:10:32 -0700, Wretch
<wretch1@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
On Jun 20, 9:55 pm, Phil <p...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, my question is, what are those allegedly incurable suckup homers
Cohen, Hernandez and/or Darling doing differently? Are they, like,
pretending the Mets are winning 93 to nothing, or talking about how the
Twins are cheating? What? There must be something, or else their
If Gary Cohen is true to form, he's busy criticizing the opposition
for poor sportsmanship and showing up the Muts,
Well, aren't we touchy? Every day, Yankee fans piss all over A-Rod
like a diabetic with half a kidney, but let one Met announcer utter so
much as a word of criticism over his bush-league bat flinging, and you
clowns whine about it constantly for the next year and a half.
and criticizing the
umpires for questionable ball and strike calls that do not favor the
Mutropolitans. He's probably also whining that some ump or other
takes too long to make his call.
He doesn't do any such thing, of course, but even if he did, it would
still be preferable to three-plus hours of bloviating over the Yankee
uniforms, making up idiotic nicknames and masturbating over pictures
of Roger Clemens: "Oh, Rawjah, please stick your steroid-shriveled
schmeckie in my hawt bawx!!!!!"
Or, John Sterling doing his passive-aggressive questioning of a balk call:
"I didn't see it. He might have balked, but I didn't see it...The Mets have
scored a run on a balk, but I wish I could see it/"
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Resuscitated
- Next by Date: Reminds me of 2001....
- Previous by thread: Re: Okay, a serious question about something stupid...
- Next by thread: Re: Okay, a serious question about something stupid...
- Index(es):