Re: Clemens as a Met?

From: Phil <phil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:38:41 GMT

On 2006-01-19 18:07:09 -0500, "Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

"Harlan Lachman" <hlachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:hlachman-67F501.18043019012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <73d9$43d01473$471dc444$14941@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why not?
Joseph, I have thought your other Why not?s were baiting responses.
Clearly, you just don't understand.


That's because he's off his high horse.

Phil

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Joseph Richardson

References:
- Clemens as a Met?
  - From: blackjet76@xxxxxxx
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Joseph Richardson
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Joseph Richardson

Prev by Date: SI off season grades
Next by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Previous by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Next by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread