Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Harlan Lachman <hlachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:28:28 -0500
In article <4136f$43d01ba2$471dc28d$12166@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Harlan Lachman" <hlachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:hlachman-67F501.18043019012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <73d9$43d01473$471dc444$14941@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Why not?
> >
> > Joseph, I have thought your other Why not?s were baiting responses.
> >
>
> Clearly, you just don't understand.
Wouldn't be the first time.
h
--
To respond, obviously drop the "nospan"?
.
- References:
- Clemens as a Met?
- From: blackjet76@xxxxxxx
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Joseph Richardson
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Harlan Lachman
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Joseph Richardson
- Clemens as a Met?
- Prev by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Next by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Previous by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Next by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|