Re: Clemens as a Met?

From: "Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:07:09 -0500

"Harlan Lachman" <hlachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hlachman-67F501.18043019012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <73d9$43d01473$471dc444$14941@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Why not?
>
> Joseph, I have thought your other Why not?s were baiting responses.
>

Clearly, you just don't understand.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Phil
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Harlan Lachman

References:
- Clemens as a Met?
  - From: blackjet76@xxxxxxx
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Joseph Richardson
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
  - From: Harlan Lachman

Prev by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Next by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Previous by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Next by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread