Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Harlan Lachman <hlachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:04:30 -0500
In article <73d9$43d01473$471dc444$14941@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Joseph Richardson" <jmrich1spam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why not?
Joseph, I have thought your other Why not?s were baiting responses.
This one I agree with. I just wish there was a chance it was so.
Clemens on this staff for one year would probably cause Steinbrenner a
heart attack.
Imagine the Press, crowds, victories and series going across the river.
He'd be so pissed.
Harlan
--
To respond, obviously drop the "nospan"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Joseph Richardson
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- References:
- Clemens as a Met?
- From: blackjet76@xxxxxxx
- Re: Clemens as a Met?
- From: Joseph Richardson
- Clemens as a Met?
- Prev by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Next by Date: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Previous by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Next by thread: Re: Clemens as a Met?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|