Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: "Met-in-PR" <orb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0400
"mrbrklyn" <spam-killer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127065782.685186.46680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Yes, but Jacobs won't cost us a bunch of kids
>
> <<The Mets need baseball players in order to win, not kids with a lot
> unfulfilled potential.>>
>
> Your so impatient.
Yep, if you mean wait until 2008 or 2009 to win then I'm impatient.
> the kids are players and we don't know what Jacobs
> can do yet.
Jacobs number can be projected by looking at his minor league career Ruben.
> Dunn, on the other hand, will not be traded just for
> Jacobs straight up
This is just something you just come up with, I never said anything about
Dunn for Jacobs straight up. Dunn is too good of a player to be gave up by
the Reds for *Just* Jacobs.
>and I don't want to give up my prospects for a 1st
> baseman, any first baseman, until I know that I don't have one in the
> system that can be part of the Reyes-Wright era.
The problem is that you are to ignorant to accept that Dunn has been/is/will
be better than Jacobs.
> Unless I can trade
> for him with Glavine, Floyd, Cameron and Traschel, I'm prepared to see
> what the scouting and coaching departments can do in the farm
> to fill my needs.
>
Again, go root for the DRays, they are a perfect organization for you. You
can even root for Kazmir over there.
>> and we just don't know
>> what Jacobs can do.
>
> <<You are right, we don't know what Jacobs can do. We know what Dunn
> can do,
> which should be better than Jacobs.>>
>
> Actually, we don't know that.
You don't understand half of baseball decisions. There is nothing I can do
about it.
>And again, Dunn for Jacobs is not a
> trade.
No, and I'm not implying that this will be the trade.
> If it is I'd probably do it but then I'd put him through the
> most extensive physical exam and psycologic testing in history.
Huh!
>I'd
> also comb through videos after videos of Dunn and Jacobs. The Reds
> would be crazy to make this trade unless our scouting missed something,
> and missed big.
>
> Ruben
>
Go play some twister, it seems is the only thing you know how to do. But for
the ones that are following the thread, let's correct whatever information
you have eliminated trying to mislead people into your arguments:
1) Dunn is/will be a better 1B option than Jacobs
2) Dunn is just 1 year older than Jacobs and already has 4 1/2 years of ML
experience
3) I never said the Mets should trade Jacobs straight up for Dunn. The Reds
will be stupid to do it. It will take a lot more than MJ.
4) Dunn is worth kids from the minors that may never fulfill their potential
--
Let's Go Mets!!!
Met-in-PR
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: mrbrklyn
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- References:
- What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: Dave Phillips
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: Larry Smith
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: Met-in-PR
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: mrbrklyn
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: Met-in-PR
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: mrbrklyn
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: Met-in-PR
- Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- From: mrbrklyn
- What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- Prev by Date: Re: Victor Diaz.....
- Next by Date: Re: Nothing like a complete game victory
- Previous by thread: Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- Next by thread: Re: What do the Mets do if they finish 76-86?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|