Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- From: "Ed D" <Ejd935@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Sep 2005 20:51:11 -0700
> You a little hard on Willie? The team lacks a decent 1B, 2B, & bullpen.
> And top that off with a CF'er who greatly underperformed.
> A catcher and RF'er who spent a good portion of the year on the DL; and
> I would say the Mets were lucky to possibly finish above .500.
>
> Super T
Stats don't prove everything but look at run differential:
Mets +70
Phila +37
Fla +27
Wash -37
I think Randolph has done the worse job of managing in the Division.
The Mets may need more talent than the other teams to win the same
number of games.
Ed D
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- From: Super T
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- From: Wee Willie Keeler
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- References:
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- From: Ed D
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- From: Super T
- Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- Prev by Date: Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- Next by Date: Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- Previous by thread: Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- Next by thread: Re: 83-79 and no playoffs, success or failure?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|