Re: There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- From: BTT <BTTalbot2003@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 04:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 7, 11:39 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/10/2011 19:47, curiousd wrote:
Article by Adam Kilgore in "Baseball Insider" . The complicated
history of Alex Rodriquez contract now comes down to: He is owed $165
million until the year 2017 when he will be 42!! OPS+ decreased four
years in row. Injuries now increasing. Yanks will need another 3b guy
because they will have to full time D.H. Rodriquez soon. Most of you
probably know this but it is an eye opener to me. What were the Yanks
thinking??
The Hicks contract was a joke.
The Yankees' extension was ludicrous.
mario in victoria
--
where did he rank among 3b men?
godwin was a nazi
And now CC may opt out, which is how ARod got his 10-year extension.
Keeping CC wil really cost 'em. This is the guy who tabled their
contract offer for 4 weeks, and only decided that he "always wanted to
be a Yankee" after they added another $10 million, IIRC.
BTT
.
- References:
- There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- From: curiousd
- Re: There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- From: mario in victoria
- There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- Prev by Date: Tweet 10/8
- Next by Date: Tweet 10/8
- Previous by thread: Re: There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- Next by thread: Re: There could be a worse contract for a team than Lackey's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
