Re: GC - does this mean...
- From: nate <greystone@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 23, 9:18 pm, gnork <4panama...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 23, 7:58 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"nate" <greyst...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20b8094e-9bf2-4bf6-948a-d080abf6ea01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...that we get Lacklustrous Lackey?
Is 2 Red Sox runs per inning going to be enough to hold off Lackey?
We shall see...
- nate
it looks like we might find out.
When they scored the 6th run, I said "Nice, but with Lackey pitching
it is not enough to be comfortable." Get the BP ready!
OMINOUS SIGN!!!! The Red Sox were shut out in the 5th!!!
DANGER! WILL ROBINSON!!!!!
- nate
.
- References:
- GC - does this mean...
- From: nate
- Re: GC - does this mean...
- From: Ray O'Hara
- Re: GC - does this mean...
- From: gnork
- GC - does this mean...
- Prev by Date: Lavarnway.
- Next by Date: Re: Lavarnway.
- Previous by thread: Re: GC - does this mean...
- Next by thread: Re: GC - does this mean...
- Index(es):