Re: Francona's ejection
"Red Sox Rule Yankees Suck" <DieHardBosoxFan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:27033-4E4743C4-624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Terry was a idiot for complaining about the Ellsbury play at home
plate.
Still down four runs regodless if the umpire didn't reverse the
call. I
can understand if it was the tying run but not when your losing 5-0.
A manager complaining about a call when your team is down by 5 runs
is
stupid.
Never mind, i'd lke to see Terry get ejected more often. That way
when
the team loses i can't blame Francona for the lose as he wasn't
around
to manage the game.
Complaining on run 1 could turn run 4 into run 5 down the road (not
that most arguments are won....).
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Franconas ejection
... Still down four runs regodless if the umpire didn't reverse the ... can understand if it was the tying run but not when your losing ...
(alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox) - Re: Franconas ejection
... Still down four runs regodless if the umpire didn't reverse the call. ... can understand if it was the tying run but not when your losing 5-0. ...
(alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox) - Re: Will the idiotic Indian tv hosts of certain channels please read the rule book
... >There is no reason at all why an umpire cannot reverse his decision in ... He describes this as a "slight but significant alteration to the 2.5m rule" where in fact the altered clause concerning whether the ball is hitting middle stump applies to all reviews of lbw decisions that were originally given not out, not just those where impact was greater than 250cm from the stumps. ... So far as I can see, nothing significant has changed: in the 250cm case the umpire is allowed to overturn his original decision but is not obliged to. ...
(rec.sport.cricket) - Re: 2006 Oval Test to be declared a draw on Thursday 3rd July 2008
... Fair enough but why does Agnew not recall that Hair was declared the ... The Pakistani team was cleared ... If you are losing get the coach to ... The umpire will then penalize the winning team who will be ...
(rec.sport.cricket) - Re: 2006 Oval Test to be declared a draw on Thursday 3rd July 2008
... Fair enough but why does Agnew not recall that Hair was declared the ... The Pakistani team was cleared ... And that they were certainly not losing at the time:) ... The umpire will then penalize the winning team who will be ...
(rec.sport.cricket) |
|
