Re: I. . . I just couldn't do it!!! :_(

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:32:44 -0800 (PST), john.vampatella@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:

On Mar 5, 11:04 am, "Ray O'Hara" <mary.palmu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

lets say you invest it and some scoundral embezzles all the money, you'd be
the first pewrson screaming for relief.

Actually, I wouldn't. I actually take responsibility for my actions.
If I screw it up, I screw it up. There are lots of really safe
investment vehicles - like an FDIC insured certificate of deposit (you
know what FDIC insured means, right? that your money is guaranteed to
be safe) - that give you twice the interest rate that Social Security
does.

I see. You like government programs (FDIC) from the Great Depression
days that prevent bank depositors from losing their savings to
irresponsible or unlucky banks but you don't like government programs
that prevent people with no assets from starving.

But, as I noted in my prior post, SS does NOT give you ANY interest
rate. It is not an investment program. It is a transfer program, from
one generation to the prior generation.


But even if your view is right...all that means is that the government
feels responsible for making choices for people. That sounds a lot
less like freedom and a lot more like forms of government
that...well...aren't too good.

Really? Think back to 1938. Your grandparents are totally broke after
the longest and hardest depression in American history. And now they
are too old to work. And here comes that big bad FDR government coming
in and making choices for them --- offering them a decent life in
retirement. But your freedom-loving grandparent rebel --- they want
the freedom to starve, etc. Really?

No, John. A government that ensures the basic economic needs of the
people increases choices. Money gives choices. If you have no money,
you really have very few choices in our society.

You start with a false premise --- that people have this pot of money
and can invest it wisely (in good private-sector funds or
government-guaranteed funds) , spend it on the high life, or invest it
foolishly (or become the victims private-sector theives). Well, the
"pot" you are thinking about is already committed. You can't invest
your pot of money (so to speak) and still pay the SS pensions of the
retiring generation, in accordance with the promise made in 1938. So,
when you talk about a pot of money to invest, you are first talking
about stiffing the generation that supported your grandparents.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
    ... invested in government bonds backed by the full faith and credit..." ... >the only place gov't gets money from),or SS benefits or who can draw SS ... It means a huge debt to invest in the stock market. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: California will commit suicide by voter again.
    ... Nobody able to care for themselves is taken care of ty taxpayer money. ... democrats get out of my life? ... Don't you realize that when the government buys your education, ... A Ponzi scheme pretends to invest in something. ...
    (misc.legal)
  • Re: I. . . I just couldnt do it!!! :_(
    ... You like government programs from the Great Depression ... Money gives choices. ... You start with a false premise --- that people have this pot of money ... government-guaranteed funds), spend it on the high life, or invest it ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Hey dude, wheres my economy?
    ... U.S. saving rates are over 6.9% and money that used to flow ... not invest and are busy laying off workers, ... bought" so the real estate business suffers. ... Just to have the government do a GM on bondholders? ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Potheads at pinball shows
    ... government. ... More money has been spent trying to put a cap on pot to no ... make money from this cash crop versus wasting money trying to stop it. ... expose them to pot smoking. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)