Re: Ellsbury unproven


"Gary" <golferace2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:bbcap31l3kltnv2vkvrok4d60kceemnll8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:20:07 +0000, richardcarlisle@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

I did not get the sense that Sarge was underrating Jacoby. Sarge was
just suggesting that we temper our optimism since the sample size in
the majors was small. Seems like a reasonable way to look at it and
hardly a sign that Sarge is "dense" or talking "crap" as Dano was
suggesting.


Oh please. Sarge is always talking crap. You're just defending him
because Dano, rightfully, disagreed with Sarge.

He should have seen the line I snipped because even I thought it was too harsh. :-)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ellsbury unproven
    ... just suggesting that we temper our optimism since the sample size in ... the majors was small. ... It just goes to show how intellectually dishonest they ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Ellsbury unproven
    ... just suggesting that we temper our optimism since the sample size in ... the majors was small. ... Sarge is always talking crap. ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Ellsbury unproven
    ... just suggesting that we temper our optimism since the sample size in ... the majors was small. ... Evidence that trolls will defend each other. ... Sarge is always talking crap. ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)