Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: mario in victoria <mario5491@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:54:06 GMT
who'sthat wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:08:31 -0500, "John Fariss"
<jfariss@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Paul Bearer" <Don't Bother...send to usenet> wrote in message news:h1b2o3p06f4td1clghss1f3n976n11eknp@xxxxxxxxxxOn Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:06:51 -0600, who'sthat <whosthat> wrote:Piggybacked:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:02:06 -0600, who'sthat <whosthat> wrote:The same could be asked for entering the war itself.
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:34:41 -0500, Paul Bearer <Don't Bother...sendHey Don't Bother....
to usenet> wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:38:33 -0600, who'sthat <whosthat> wrote:What would historians say if we dropped a nuke on a country we invadedViet Nam was NOT winnable. You lost any credibility from that pointI have to disagree. It was winnable. We just weren't willing
on.
to pay the price to win it. (i.e. drop a nuke on Hanoi.)
We sent out best and brightest over to fight the war but woudln't
let them use their best weapons.
for no reason and that was of no threat to us?
I'm still waiting for some sort of logical justification for using a
nuke on Viet Nam. They didn't provoke us in any way and they were of
no threat what so ever. What reason would you use to use a nuke on
them after we invaded them for no reason?
"invaded"
Any more doubt about his 114?
What would you call entering and attacking a country with military
force that in no way threatened or provoked us?
Same as we did in Iraq.
They're called History books. Find a couple, read a couple of chapters, then get back to us six or seven weeks.
mario in victoria
--
if his lips move, he's alive. . .
.
- References:
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: Dano
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: John Fariss
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: McDuck
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: Gnork
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: who'sthat
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: Paul Bearer
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: who'sthat
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: who'sthat
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: Paul Bearer
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: John Fariss
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- From: who'sthat
- Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- Next by Date: Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- Next by thread: Re: OT Iowa (Gnork)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|