Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:03:20 -0500, DonFromBarre@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

RC says:
<<Explain why you think that by my interpretation, your implying I might
be an anti-Semite was a joke? Be specific.>>

Still more proof of you not getting it. Although I suspect that in this
case it's intentional that you don't get the relationship between my
saying I was joking and your molestation joke.

The relationship that I see is that I was joking about Griffin and in
your case you were not joking about me but say you were. In other
words you say that you were joking but that is a lie. It is clear you
were not joking. I don't see your point and you refuse to explain
other than to say that I am not getting it.





And your continued
bringing up the original poster of that joke is a waste of time as it
has nothingto do with this discussion.

But it is not a waste of time with respect to understanding YOUR
motivation in confronting me but not the original poster. I understand
your reluctance to answer the question. You say absolutely nothing to
the guy who started it. That suggests it was not what was said but who
said it. You give the guy who originally said it a complete pass and
focus on me.


<<You know that both said that they have kill filed me so why did you
snip out my statements that completely refute their allegations? You
know that if you included my statements both Dano and Mario could read
it. But you don't want them to know the truth so you snip it. That way
they could continue to call me an anti-Semite with plausible deniability
that they did not read my very pro-Israel and pro-Jewish statements. And
you will likely snip these comments too if and when you respond to this
post. Because that is the kind of guy you are.>>

I snip things you say because most of your responses are way over
stated.

I was accused of being an anti-Semite by a number of individuals in
this group. I then posted my opinions about Jewish people and you say
it is over stated? How did I overstate it? Be specific.




I only respond to those things that stand out.

So you don't think all the things I said about Jewish people stands
out especially when accused of anti-Semitism?



There is no
premeditation involved. Just trying to battle your attempts to muddy
the waters.

How is explaining my opinion about Jewish people muddying the waters
with respect to answering the accusation of my being
racist/anti-Semite? I was doing the opposite of muddying the water. I
was trying to refute the accusations and the best way to do it is to
clearly explain what I think about Jewish people.

Your assertion that I am "muddying the water" makes absolutely no
sense. It is YOU who is muddying that water by accusing me of doing
same. Do you know what that term means?




Ever notice that the rest of us can get our points across
using about a quater of the words you do?

Maybe you just think you are getting your point across well. Sorry for
being verbose but when someone accuses you of being an anti-Semite I
think that I need to provide enough information to refute such a false
assertion.

<<If no one in this group will discuss anything respectfully with me
then that is their problem not mine.>>

So it is the rest of the world and not you?

Not quite the rest of the world. Hate to break it to you Don, but the
members of this group are not the entire world nor do they represent
the typical members of society (thank the Lord). There are fewer than
100 regular posters in this group. Hardly the rest of the world.



Were I an amatuer shrink as
you seem to be I might call that delusions of granduer.

Do you even know what "delusions of grandeur" means? Obviously not. It
describes a person who believes that they have much greater power and
influence over others than they actually do. I freely admit I have
very little power or influence over individuals in this group or
society at large for that matter. How on earth you think that applies
to me is beyond me.

I *do* believe that many individuals in this group are very immature
and insecure individuals who have difficulty dealing with constructive
criticism and respond with intense anger when confronted. And I can
provide evidence to support my assertion. But that is hardly delusion
of grandeur. It is an observation with much data to support it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you think there is anything even close to resembling a good baseball
reason for supporting J .D. Drew much less continuing to play him than you
really are a brain dead, mentally retarded stupid idiot.

Don From Barre 9/6/2007
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
    ... Explain why you think that by my interpretation, your implying I might ... be an anti-Semite was a joke? ... implying I am an anti-Semite for not saying anything about the troll's ... Did you agree that they were respectful especially considering how ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
    ... Dano has called me an anti-Semite. ... I make a joke about Griffin and you blow a gasket. ... refer to it as a "molestation incident". ... unlike the allegations made against me by Griffin ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Temple invites Mel to be guest speaker
    ... It's not a joke. ... The word anti-semite loses its meaning when used as you are using it, ... all the jews that saw the events of amonaand ... mentioned Amona, to him, and he held his head and said it was "worse ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
    ... saying I was joking and your molestation joke. ... know that if you included my statements both Dano and Mario could read ... But you don't want them to know the truth so you snip it. ... they could continue to call me an anti-Semite with plausible deniability ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)