Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- From: richardcarlisle@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:40:21 +0000
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:06:58 -0500, DonFromBarre@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Okay, my implying, by your interpretation, you might be an anti-semite
was a joke.
Explain why you think that by my interpretation, your implying I might
be an anti-Semite was a joke? Be specific.
I will ask you directly. Were you joking or were you serious? I
thought you were being serious. I think that Dano and Mario were being
serious.
OTOH I clearly was joking about Griffin being on Catch A Predator. I
do note that you did not say a word to the person who originally
posted the joke about Griffin.
I'd like to think you won't have your head too far up
someone's *** that you'll get my point in saying that.
Actually I think your head is up your *** if you think that your
statement should be taken as a joke by my interpretation of what a
joke is.
Let me be clear. When you are joking, you don't literally mean what
you are saying. So when I said that about Griffin I did not literally
mean it. That should have been obvious to everyone. However your
implying I am an anti-Semite for not saying anything about the troll's
anti-semitic comment was not a joke. Or at least it did not appear
that way to me. Of course you can clarify it now. Was it a joke or
were you serious?
I admit I was joking about Griffin.
But just in
case, what's worse, implying someone might be an anti-semite or joking
about someone maybe being a child molestor?
What is worse is implying someone is an anti-Semite with no evidence
especially after two individuals Mario and Dano directly accused me of
same.
If you don't "get" that
well it's been said repeatedly hasn't it?
I get that you don't understand the difference between a joke which is
not meant to be taken seriously and an implication which IS meant to
be taken seriously. Your implication of my being an anti-Semite seemed
clear to be meant to be taken seriously. But you can clarify that if
you choose to do so.
I do note that you completely ignored my statements about Jewish
people and support of Israel which completely contradicts the
statements that both Dano and Mario made about me as well as your
implication.
You could have said that after reading what I wrote that it is clear
that I am not anti-Semitic assuming that I was being honest. But again
you completely ignored it. I have said that you have no integrity in
the past and this is more evidence of it.
You know that both said that they have kill filed me so why did you
snip out my statements that completely refute their allegations? You
know that if you included my statements both Dano and Mario could read
it. But you don't want them to know the truth so you snip it. That way
they could continue to call me an anti-Semite with plausible
deniability that they did not read my very pro-Israel and pro-Jewish
statements. And you will likely snip these comments too if and when
you respond to this post. Because that is the kind of guy you are.
<<I can discuss things logically and mutually respectfully with others
who can do likewise as I have demonstrated repeatedly in this group.>>
Name one person in this group who still discusses anything respectfully
with you. But of course it's not you but the rest of the world.
If no one in this group will discuss anything respectfully with me
then that is their problem not mine. Recently I posted responses
regarding religion that I thought were respectful. Did you read them?
Did you agree that they were respectful especially considering how
volatile a topic religion is? I cannot help it if individuals in this
group choose to only respond to my posts when they involve being
critical of someone as you are doing now.
But to answer your question, I think that Lee Harris and I can have a
mutually respectful discussion. He does not post here much but our
last interaction was mutually respectful AFAICR.
RC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think there is anything even close to resembling a good baseball
reason for supporting J .D. Drew much less continuing to play him than you
really are a brain dead, mentally retarded stupid idiot.
Don From Barre 9/6/2007
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- From: DonFromBarre
- Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- References:
- Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- From: richardcarlisle
- Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- From: DonFromBarre
- Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- Prev by Date: Re: Bowl games, not getting it
- Next by Date: Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- Previous by thread: Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- Next by thread: Re: Leyritz arrested for vehicular manslaughter and DWI
- Index(es):