Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: "Dano" <janeanddano@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:57:34 -0500
"Keith Willoughby" <keith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:87ir3klvak.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dano" <janeanddano@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Pearly Soames" <tom.champagne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ewz3j.9$Wl1.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fred Burton wrote:I keep re-reading that to try to make sense of it. You must have
It also did it without Dan Haren and his 15 wins. I'll roll the
dice gladly that Buchholz is able to duplicate that.
Piggybacked, with a tip of the cap to Pedro:
I doubt that Buchholz will win 30 games next season.
snipped something improperly or something. I'm sure it seemed clever
when you hit *send*.
Didn't you, at any point, wonder if there was something about this that
you'd missed?
Uh...yeah...that was the point of MY post...WTF else would I be re-reading his???
The point sure appeared to mean Buchholz could get 15 wins.
When did Pedro win 30?
He was once asked if he could duplicate last season's record, and he
replied "That would be 46 wins", or similar. Pretty clever stuff for a
non-native speaker to realise the question should be "repeat", not
"duplicate".
I don't see what is so clever about Pedro's quote really either. At best it's an effort of obfuscating by the use of semantics. I don't get it. What is the difference? You do know what to duplicate means don't you? School me...explain this, to this poor uneducated soul here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Keith Willoughby
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- References:
- Santana/Haren P
- From: CalC
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Dano
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Pearly Soames
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Dano
- Re: Santana/Haren P
- From: Keith Willoughby
- Santana/Haren P
- Prev by Date: Help "Soxville" beat Brooklyn!
- Next by Date: Re: Rumor out of the Twin Cities
- Previous by thread: Re: Santana/Haren P
- Next by thread: Re: Santana/Haren P
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|