Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: "Fred Burton" <fburton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:21:20 -0400
"Edward" <Edward.Nuxters@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183437403.894701.60990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 2, 11:25 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:13:55 -0400, Fred Burton wrote:
Even back in 1900, according to news reports of the day, the people
were
intelligent and educated enough to know that the new century started on
1/1/1901, not 1/1/1900.
Choice "A" is the choice of the ignorant.
You're wrong. I was starting to think you had some sense, but you've
just
shown otherwise.
Make it easy on yourself... start counting from year "0000". On Jan 1,
0001, how many years have elapsed? Yes, the answer is "one".
Now, apply that logic to Jan 1, 0100. How many years have elapsed? Yes,
the answer is "one hundred".
Continuing this logic, it's easy to see that on Jan 1, 1900, exactly
"nineteen hundred" years have *already elapsed*. That's the key. So
therefore, Jan 1, 1900 is the first day of a *new century*.
What you're missing is that the counter starts at day number "zero", so
that when you reach the end of the "first year", a full year has *already
elapsed*. Simple, huh?
Wow, Dan. you sure do make alot of friends 'roud these parts.
I'll let the people who are actually correct (not you) have at you.
Maybe then you... I dunno, laugh at yourself?
Dan, I don't know who this dipstick is, but ignore him. But after his crude
reply
to my "What about Rick Burleson?" reply, I have no doubt whatsoever that
he's
some sort of troll and should br treated thusly.
.
- References:
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Jim Tiberio
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: DonFromBarre
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: bizook
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Lyford
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Lyford
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: bizook
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Dan C
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- From: Edward
- Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- Prev by Date: Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- Next by Date: Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- Previous by thread: Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- Next by thread: Re: For the "Sub .500 Junies" !!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|