Re: Mike Lowell
- From: Nate Smith <greystone@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:17:56 -0500
Buster wrote:
I would have preferred Billy there but to get the big kid from Fla. we had to take him and play him since he has a contract too big to eat.
i dont understand, in this case, why lowell's contract
puts him in the starting lineup. everyone kneaux it was
the bad you had to take with the good in the deal.
also - i admit to stupidity - i didnt see where Graffanino
left the team...sportscaster on TV was saying he was gone.
these other 2b men have to beat him out for the starting
job in my opinion. graffy hit .309 there. how did that
cost him his starting job?
so what happened that a sportscaster said he's "gone"???
i missed that.
- nate
.
- References:
- Mike Lowell
- From: Tuco
- Re: Mike Lowell
- From: Buster
- Mike Lowell
- Prev by Date: Re: Lindsey Jacobellis
- Next by Date: Re: I'm friggin back! (putting flame suit on)
- Previous by thread: Re: Mike Lowell
- Next by thread: Re: Mike Lowell
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|