Re: Manny, etc.
- From: Keith Willoughby <keith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:37:11 +0000
"Nolan Patrick" <CallThatGone@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Gnork wrote:
>>
>> Unbelievable in what respect? Perhaps unbelievably worse than 2005?
>> Roberts is not a regular on a good hitting team, because he is a poor
>> hitter. Lowell is unlikely to make a full comeback and more unlikely to
>> be better than Youkilis.
>
> I understand not liking the Lowell addition. But not better than
> Youkilis? Youkilis hasn't proven ***, other than he can pack in a
> hurry. That's ridiculous.
Youkilis has proven time and time again in the minors that he can get on
base. In limited playing time in the majors . . . he got on base. You
could probably plug him in for at least .270/.370/.410.
--
Keith Willoughby http://flat222.org/keith/
They are laughing at me, not with me
.
- References:
- Manny, etc.
- From: john . vampatella
- Re: Manny, etc.
- From: Gnork
- Re: Manny, etc.
- From: Nolan Patrick
- Manny, etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: I'd do this deal. It seems to make sense. Manny like Pettite?
- Next by Date: Re: Text of Red Sox HOF argument (very long)
- Previous by thread: Re: Manny, etc.
- Next by thread: Re: Manny, etc.
- Index(es):