Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Todd <toddcaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:52:17 -0500
Gnork wrote:
Todd wrote:
Gnork wrote:
john.vampatella@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Gnork wrote:
Jim Tiberio wrote:
"Curly C" <KeeponChooglin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:13411-4385BD68-18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lowell has been the best defensive 3B in the NL the last 2 years. He will not be playing 1B.
Hopefully he won't be playing 3B either.
Drumroll and thank you. Except you dunderheadedly omitted "for Boston".
I would ask for proof of his "best defensive 3B" as well. This year he ranked 6th among the 9 full time qualifiers at 3rd in ZR. Expanded to include all with 65 or more games there he was 12th of 16. Excuse me for not being convinced.
Gentlemen,
This trade was for Beckett. Lowell is simply a throw-in that Florida was stapling on to any deal involving Beckett. If - a big if - Boston gets a 20 hr, 75 rbi, good glove season out of him, it's a bonus. Rest assured, the success of this deal hinges on the right arm of Beckett.
If, for example, Boston gets .290, 30 hr, 100 rbi out of Lowell but 7-11, 4.65 era, and 3 trips to the DL from Beckett, Sox brass, deep down, won't really be thrilled with the trade.
John, you nattering nudnik,
What you are not thinking about is if Lowell is anywhere near as bad as last year and if the Red Sox are stupid enough to play him regularly despite that badness, the damage Lowell does to the team could easily exceed the positive Beckett will bring. Very easily considering Beckett has never exceeded 179 innings in a season. If Beckett brings an extra 3 wins over and above what they could have had without him and Lowell causes an extra 4 losses, what have they gained other than lots of salary? They should be trying to trade Lowell right now and offering to pay half his salary or take on another big salary with a greater probability of success. I have a deal in mind, but I want to see what happens with J.D. and M.R. first.
Gnork, I am curious to what you have in mind so let me pose the following situations to you and see what you are thinking of..
1. Red Sox Sign JD and KEEP MR
2. Red Sox do not sign JD and KEEP MR
3. Red Sox sign JD and Trade MR (I will say for 3 high level prospects so I dont block any positions you are thinking about)
4. Red Sox do not sign JD and Trade MR for 3 high level prospects
I am not "thinking" that any one of those four will happen. I am thinking that I need to wait and see what does happen. My preference always has been to keep both of them. If someone must be overpaid, let it be someone who has produced for the team in the past and not two stiffs (Renteria and Lowell) brought in from the outside. I find that disgusting.
I agree. I want both Manny and Damon to stay. I do not want Damon for anything more than 4 years though. I do not mind overpaying players so much if they are overpaid for a short period of time. This is why I do not so much mind overpaying Lowell for now (heck..half his salary went to BK Kim last season). The way the FA market is going this year, if Lowell returns to his 2004 stats I would be happy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Gnork
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- References:
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: DonFromBarre
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Curly C
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Jim Tiberio
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Gnork
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: john . vampatella
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Gnork
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Todd
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- From: Gnork
- Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- Prev by Date: Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- Next by Date: Re: 2006 Starting Rotation and Bullpen
- Previous by thread: Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- Next by thread: Re: My thoughts on the trade !!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|