Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: "Gnork" <gnork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Nov 2005 23:16:38 -0800
Mark Stahl wrote:
> "Jim Tiberio" <jimtiberio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3uf9jcF119fiiU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
> > I'm already assuming Wells is gone. Wells and Lowell both health risks.
> > Beckett has never neared 200 IP
>
> Is 179 IP "near" 200 IP? That is how many he threw last year at his age
> 24-25 season. He's younger than Jon Papelbon and already an ace!
I would say, no it is not near 200 IP. It is 10.5% short.
> True. We'll see about him, but the worst case is that he rots on the bench
> for awhile as a defensive sub/pinch hitter/whatever and the Sox still have
> Beckett.
The Dodgers might be interested in Lowell if the sending team pays half
his salary.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: Mark Stahl
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- References:
- ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: eaglesclaw
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: Jim Tiberio
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: The Hip Lord Teddy of RedSoxia
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: Jim Tiberio
- Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- From: Mark Stahl
- ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- Prev by Date: Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- Next by Date: Re: Gammons says Sox land Beckett
- Previous by thread: Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- Next by thread: Re: ESPN Reporting Beckett and Lowell to Sox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|