Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: "Fred Burton" <fburton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:16:06 -0400
Gary wrote in message <19rde11h54c6l6a1gbali6vud5kt3b96u6@xxxxxxx>...
>On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:01:32 -0400, "Fred Burton"
><fburton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>Gary wrote in message ...
>>>On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:42:12 -0400, "Fred Burton"
>>><fburton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>No shit. Why the hell wasn't Ortiz PH'ing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At least Mueller got an RBI single.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't mind too much hitting Olerud there since they did have a LHP
>>>on the mound. But I would have used him when Harper came in.
>>
>>I minded because Olerud hasn't been hitting worth shit lately.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I understand. But Terry could have pinch hit him for Graffinino
>against Harper. Better then that last inning with no one on base.
I wouldn't have PH for Graffanino.
I really would have PH him for Hyzdu. It would have been a nice situation.
2 men on and only 1 out. Frankly, I'm not so sure that I'd have bothered
PH-ing with 2 out and nobody on. Kind of wasting a great RBI and HR threat.
This is one of those things that's sooooooooo annoying about Tito. He just
doesn't seem to think these things through. I know that he supposedly does,
but I just cannot figure out his logic sometimes. 2 men on with 1 out would
have been such a strong situation for Papi.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Gary
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- References:
- GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Nate Smith
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Gary
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Fred Burton
- Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- From: Gary
- GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- Prev by Date: Wishing Clement good health
- Next by Date: Re: GC - now delcarmen
- Previous by thread: Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- Next by thread: Re: GC - yuk olerud again PHing
- Index(es):