Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- From: anon3c67@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bruce Watson)
- Date: 24 Oct 2010 17:16:11 GMT
In article <ia1nqf$v7$2@xxxxxxxxx>,
Jim Murray <jim_DOT_murray8_AT_verizon_DOT_net> wrote:
On 10/16/2010 4:24 PM, Bruce Watson wrote:
With sustained never smokers as reference, the sustained smokers of a pipehttp://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2010/10/15/tc.2010.036780.abstract?papetoc
only had adjusted relative risk (95% CI), of dying from any cause that
was 1.99 (1.73 to 2.27). At comparable tobacco consumption, no significant
difference in risk between pipe and cigarette smokers appeared. As to
survival, no difference was found between sustained smokers of a pipe
only and of cigarettes only. Men who switched from cigarettes only to
pipe only had a risk which was not significantly different from the
risk in sustained smokers of cigarettes only.
Conclusions Between pipe and cigarette smokers, no or only minor
differences were found in mortality from any cause and the specified
smoking-related diseases. Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette
smoking.
Go to http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze43wza/In%20Defense.gif to get
the REAL story.
I've traded words with Colby. Is he dead? What did he die of?
You've referenced the BIBLE of smokers' rationalizations.
REAL story?
It might read that way to an addict.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- From: Jim Murray
- Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- References:
- Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- From: Bruce Watson
- Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- From: Jim Murray
- Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- Prev by Date: Re: Morning Smoke 10/24/10
- Next by Date: Re: Morning Smoke 10/24/10
- Previous by thread: Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- Next by thread: Re: Pipe smoking is not safer than cigarette smoking.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
