Re: Walgreen sues city and county of San Francisco because of tobacco ban

On 6/21/2010 9:43 AM, infodex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 21 Jun 2010 14:57:29 GMT, anon3c67@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bruce Watson)
wrote:

And once again Spruce demonstrates his total lack of understanding of
logical discourse, thus diiscrediting any conclusions he might draw
about smokers, or anything else, for that matter.

Get this through your head: PROOF IS INCUMBENT ON THE PERSION MAKING
THE CLAIM. THERE IS NO BURDEN TO PROVE A NEGATIVE.

Honestly, you argue like a five year old.
Close - he argues like some kid in elementary school that took one class in one subject and now considers himself an expert. Aside from that he's kissing the teachers ass.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Float comparison
    ... I draw the analogy with chess. ... If I were to argue that the Standard requires ... Oddly enough, however, I think that for once Chuck is at least ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: NOT SOLD: Borland Launches CodeGear to SupplyDeveloperswithTools....
    ... Some people will argue that there was no sale, in which case there's a draw, since the bet involved a transaction and a close of escrow as well ... Other people will argue that Borland is the investor and buyer. ... The 1st case is a draw. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: English Feudal Baronies (update)
    ... >readers will be able to draw their own conclusions. ... The only way to argue would ... The complete guide to the British Peerage ...
    (rec.heraldry)
  • Re: English Feudal Baronies (update)
    ... You simply won't argue the case on its merits, ... readers will be able to draw their own conclusions. ...
    (rec.heraldry)