Re: Revised to: They Didn't Tell What It Would Be Like....



Mouse wrote:
Jim Beard wrote:
Ed wrote:
A nanny-tax on junk food is being bandied about. The following link
is to a story in the Sun Sentinel, a major newspaper in the Fort
Lauderdale, FL area.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/la-sci-junk-food-tax23-2009aug23,0,5963700.story


I know there were some predictions here long ago, but I really didn't
think it would happen. Maybe the junk food eaters (doesn't that mean
practically everyone?) will come to our side.

As the above pertains to "health care" that the Demograts have made a centerpiece of their efforts, some my find it useful to see what "health care" is like when the USG is fully in charge of it. Watch for line wrap.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203706604574376981533298534.html?mod=djemEditorialPage


No cheers.

jim b.

--
Once again.
Thanks for that article, jim. I have been, more or less, of the opinion that any change would have to be an improvement over the $15K my wife and I spend each year for almost nothing but insurance 'just in case' (and that doesn't even kick in 'till we're out another $6k in deductible), but this article has presented another side I hadn't seen.
Mouse

Well, the Government's programs to encourage medical insurance have so skewed the market that it is hard to see how any change could make things worse, but if you look carefully, it can and most likely will. Currently, about $1 of every $6 of gross domestic product goes for medical expenses, and I cannot see that Americans are getting service that would justify even half of that. If the Government starts picking up the entire tab, or forces its pricing policies on all, that cost will continue to go up without restraint. I do not see prospects for service to improve, musch less match increases in costs, until those getting the services start having to pay a large fraction of the cost of them. At that point, they will start demanding value for money, and the cost/benefit ratio will improve over time. But will this ever happen?

There is yet another side, Veterans Administration health care, for those wounded or disabled in line of duty, and veterans unable to pay their own medical bills. The latter applies only for those eligible due to service in a combat zone; routine peacetime service does not qualify.

Search the web for information on it, and you will find lots of information on how much the system has improved, and how happy patients are. What you will not see is data on real medical support provided vs needed, and a patient population so used to getting virtually nothing that anything seems to be welcomed with great happiness.

Straying from health care, U.S. Government provision of education to Indian tribes likewise shows what government is capable of when it owns the whole program. 'Fraid that is not much.

Still no cheers.

jim b.

--
UNIX is not user unfriendly; it merely
expects users to be computer-friendly.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT government healthcare and it is more expensive & not as comprehensive
    ... Probably because his movie is about health care for the average ... libraries and fire departments don't cost the individual user extra ... What happens now when government proposes to cut Medicare services? ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
  • Re: Myths and Facts About Single-Payer Healthcare
    ... Many people complain that insurance companies meddle with the ... delivery of good health care in their effort to control costs. ... insurers with a massive monlithic meddling government bureaucracy. ... The other cost is the cost of profit, ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: What is a Liberal? What is a Conservative?
    ... Liberals are collectivists who believe government is the god. ... Education will NOT have any effect on the costs of certain needs, such as Health Care. ... poor, get the most education they can, don't commit crimes, don't abuse alcohol or drugs. ... Conservatives will refuse to acknowledge the increasing complexity of the need as well as the total cost. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Hillarys health plan estimates too low, analysts say
    ... By Donald Lambro - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's universal health care ... think tank analysts said yesterday. ... presidential campaign to cost $110 billion a year. ... noting that previous government cost estimates have been ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Universal health care?
    ... On 8/31/2010 11:20 AM, Jim _Mac wrote: ... want this conservative country to elect 60 or more far left socialist ... If that is the kind of government you want, ... We deserve and shall continue to demand Universal Health Care right here. ...
    (soc.retirement)