- From: Mouse <mice42@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:52:47 -0500
Mark Peeples wrote:
Briarroot wrote:LOL, I don't have kids, either, and am happy to pay for someone else to do that, fwiw,Troll wrote:
Let's see here. SCHIP a national program. How will the money be used?
Will probably require A National oversite commision (Director, Asst.
Dir. ETC). Of course those Executive types will all volunteer there
time and efforts. Next a large administrative staff (all volunteer ).
Seeing to it that each state uses the MONEY properly HMMM. We all know
how well the SEC did on wall street. Pres. Obama may very well care
about the health and welfare of children, but the government has a
completely different agenda. Lining pockets, self prestige, and
ultimately the real reason POWER. The use of children as a focal point
is an old ploy. How could any real human argue against help for our
It's not really about "helping kids;" it's about *control* It's about who gets to run things, set priorities, decide what is right and what is wrong and how much *you* are going to pay for it.
Tim Parker ... Samuel Gawith - Best Brown Flake in a basket billiard
What about those of use who can't have kids?
I've paid thousands upon thousands to give more and more tax breaks for families with kids, and continue year after year paying school taxes. They say that investing in the kids, even if you have none, benefits the society. Bullshit.
After seeing the way these kids are not taught in schools, and have zero skills besides handling an iPod or texting on the phone, I think "I" deserve a tax break for not bringing a kid into this world.
But.....I/we are such a small minority that "WE" don't count.........
- Prev by Date: Re: SCHIP
- Next by Date: Re: SCHIP
- Previous by thread: Re: SCHIP
- Next by thread: Re: SCHIP