Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- From: Charles <funnster@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:04:05 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 17, 11:27 pm, NICHE541 <oikos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 17, 10:08 pm, Charles Potter <cpotter13...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark McKay wrote:
Not bothering me at all....and the P-Lip took me a bowl or so to get
used too...I kinda like it now...just wondering why the difference...:)
Stain inside the bowl, maybe? Many Peterson's are dip stained. Probably
cheaper to do it this way, but not as good. Maybe the cake doesn't form
as fast on the stain? I don't really know, I'm certainly no expert on
Peterson pipes. I only know that I don't want any. No offense intended. :)
Charles
In the Peterson brochures it says they dip stain them. I think you
have to burn the stain off. that might be a good pipe to try the honey
and carbon powder breakin.
John in the Indian Nations
I've never had a problem with Petersons but all my recent
ones have been estates. My new ones were before the dip staining
procedure was used. But they are worth the effort for those of
you wanting to invest in a Pete. I like my Stanwells also. Then again
all of my Stanwells have been estates also.
Funn
.
- References:
- Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- From: Charles Potter
- Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- From: Mark McKay
- Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- From: Charles Potter
- Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- From: NICHE541
- Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- Prev by Date: Re: Enjoyable return & belated 10th ASP anniversary
- Next by Date: Re: Evening Bowl 2/17/09
- Previous by thread: Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- Next by thread: Re: Let's Have Another Go At Cake
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
