SHS [was: Article]
- From: Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:55:45 -0700
On 2012-05-01 22:12:42 +0000, Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Next you'll be telling us the study on second hand smoke showed no evidence AT ALL to support their current campaign to eliminate it; IOW, nothing had a relative risk greater than random chance.
Hey, given that this is the case (objective fact, not open for discussion), what do we suppose *IS* the CDC's beef with the tobacco industry?
Let's even try to do it without too much "they're mean, hateful, spiteful little people" stuff -- is there any honest-to-goodness legitimate beef that they might have? Like, why =WOULDN'T= the government want 66% of the population smoking a pack a day and paying taxes up the wahzoo?!?!
--
Please remove your pants if you want to send me e-mail.
Lots of good cigar info, the ASC Birthday page, FAQs, vendors and more at
<http://www.ManyFriends.com/Cigars/>
A "great" review is one with the name of the cigar before the review text in the body of the post. :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SHS [was: Article]
- From: Mickey
- Re: SHS [was: Article]
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: SHS [was: Article]
- References:
- Article
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Article
- From: Mickey
- Article
- Prev by Date: Re: Article
- Next by Date: Re: Article
- Previous by thread: Re: Article
- Next by thread: Re: SHS [was: Article]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
