Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain



Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com> wrote in
news:jb8fr3$lrk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

If I were willing to allow you to specify what constitutes "proof"
would you be able to prove God exists?

A "proof" is an argument that convinces. In math, proofs
are airtight. In other fields, less so. In forensics, even
less so. But since a proof is a communication between two
people, the two have to agree on what a proof is.

As Alex amply demonstrated, he is proof against all proofs.

It's another example of how closed-minded all atheists are.


--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DH Idiocy 1
    ... The nature of real proof is that it convinces those who do not believe. ... Happens all the time in math and science. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: DH Idiocy 1
    ... The nature of real proof is that it convinces those who do not believe. ... Happens all the time in math and science. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)