Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Nov 2011 01:24:15 GMT
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:05:19 -0600, Mickey wrote:
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:16:08 -0600, Mickey wrote:
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 04:02:27 -0800, CigarBaron wrote:
How do you know Cain's affairs, if happened, wasn't consensual?
I don't. It's he-said she-said.
No, it isn't. it's she said vs. he said and they said.
The people who have known Herman Cain have said that what he is
accused of isn't in his personality. The people who have known his
accusers and worked with them have said that this stuff is par for
the course for them.
It's not true because his supporters are vouching for him. That
didn't work for Clinton.
That is because a bunch of weasels vouching for another weasel is not
believable.
My team is right and good. The other team is wrong and evil.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Mickey
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- References:
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Mickey
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Mickey
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Tony
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: CigarBaron
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Mickey
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Carbon
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- From: Mickey
- Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- Prev by Date: Re: CBOT Traders talk back the 39%
- Next by Date: Re: Perdomo question
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- Next by thread: Re: Why the right is unfair to Cain
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|