Re: A new career...?!

On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:09:52 -0500, Mickey wrote:
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 20:09:34 -0500, Mickey wrote:
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 13:51:52 -0500, Mickey wrote:

I don't believe your assertion that "...95%+ of the world's
climatologists believe that AGW is real." It is not true.

"Although preliminary estimates from published literature and
expert surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists
on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American
public expresses substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic
cause and the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. A
broad analysis of the climate scientist community itself, the
distribution of credibility of dissenting researchers relative to
agreeing researchers, and the level of agreement among top climate
experts has not been conducted and would inform future ACC dis-
cussions. Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate
researchers and their publication and citation data to show that
(i) 97?98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in
the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative
climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers
unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced
researchers.

http://goo.gl/ZMQF

Right. 97%+ of the climatologist we chose for this study believe in
ACC. Whom did they choose? Why, the climatolgist who have been
publishing.

The emails from East Anglia show that from the very beginning of
this fraud, it was decided that those who didn't play ball and whore
themselves for grant money would find it impossible to get
published.

Was that the one where no evidence of fraud or misconduct was found?

You are joking, right? Do you dismiss the emails from East Anglia?

I'll put it this way: do I think the stolen emails prove that all global
warming research is fraudulent. No, I do not.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sci-art, conflation, portals and climactic tsunamis
    ... Climate change does have a tiny impact on earthquakes but that's not what Dr Y is ... ... found academic journal publishing to be a lucrative market, ... gets rejected by the more respectable journals. ... engineers, mechanical engineers, mathematicians, computer scientists, and even once with a psychologist. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: A new career...?!
    ... same people who faked the temperature data? ... surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the ... level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: A new career...?!
    ... same people who faked the temperature data? ... surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the ... level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Cultural imperialism in the news?
    ... his fellow authors compiled a database of 1,372 climate researchers. ... then focused on scientists who had published at least 20 papers on climate, ... on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), ... 97-98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: A new career...?!
    ... surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the ... the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. ... climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)