Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: CigarBaron <garbaron67j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:09:51 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 2, 2:29 am, Carbon <nob...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The attempt was made earlier to pin the dysfunctional mass torts/medical
malpractice clusterfuck solely on the Democrats. Whereas 1) the
Republicans have nearly as many lawyers as the Democrats, and 2) it
doesn't matter anyway because the TLA and related lobby groups will
happily bribe whoever is in power. The current legal mess did not come
about because Democrats are evil. It came about because Washington is
corrupt. Just this once, can we agree on this blindingly obvious fact?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Remember, I was ONLY discussing malpractice plaintiff lawyers...not
the make up of our government's legislatures.
Malpractice (plaintiff lawyers) are clearly democrat.
CigarBaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- References:
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Tony
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Prev by Date: Re: treatments were not “cost effective”
- Next by Date: Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Previous by thread: Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Next by thread: Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|