Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 01 Mar 2011 05:01:03 GMT
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:47:58 -0500, Tony wrote:
On 2/27/11 5:34 PM, Carbon wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:21:09 -0600, Mickey wrote:
Marc, I honestly think you'd be surprised, shocked and horrified by
how far the practice of medicine would sink, even in the US, if
Obamacare is allowed to proceed full volume. It may be another
generation before it really kicks in, but with the lack of physicians,
lack of facilities, both caused by the lack of incentive, we are
looking at the potential for a real horror story.
How can you be so sure Democrats would be against Tort reform? The
current system harms everyone except the lawyers.
Have you looked at the percentage of Democrat congressmen who are
lawyers?
Is it different from the percentage of Republican congressmen who are
lawyers?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Tony
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- References:
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- From: Tony
- Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Prev by Date: Re: treatments were not “cost effective”
- Next by Date: Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- Previous by thread: Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Next by thread: Re: treatments were not "cost effective"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
