Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- From: Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2011 00:28:36 GMT
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:53:13 -0600, Mickey wrote:
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:21:09 -0600, Mickey wrote:
Marc, I honestly think you'd be surprised, shocked and horrified by
how far the practice of medicine would sink, even in the US, if
Obamacare is allowed to proceed full volume. It may be another
generation before it really kicks in, but with the lack of
physicians, lack of facilities, both caused by the lack of
incentive, we are looking at the potential for a real horror story.
How can you be so sure Democrats would be against Tort reform? The
current system harms everyone except the lawyers.
Because most politicians ARE lawyers.
So your argument is that the Republicans and the Democrats are equally
corrupt? OMG common ground!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- References:
- Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: treatments were not “cost effective”
- From: CigarBaron
- Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- From: Carbon
- Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- Prev by Date: Re: $2.50 and under
- Next by Date: Re: $2.50 and under
- Previous by thread: Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- Next by thread: Re: treatments were not ?cost effective?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
