Re: Beyond belief
- From: Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:12:47 -0600
Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com> wrote:
On 2011-02-11 15:27:32 -0800, "Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> said:
"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Oh my God. How blatant. How childish. How dishonest. I am almost
speechless (like that could ever happen for real)
think the more apt term is "delusional", but that dovetails with narcissistic,
megalomanical, and a few other terms.
No, he honestly believes it! Of course, honesty, to him, is whatever
floats HIS boat.
Uh... you're kidding, right?
Yes, yes, Obama is all that you said, but I would-a thought for sure
that the blatant, childish & dishonest accusations were being thrown at
RCP for trying to bend that quote into Obama self-referring as "The
Gipper." That's a stretch, even for the most adamant 'Bammer-hater.
(I'm pretty sure he just mis-spoke (note how he turns away from the
direction of the teleprompter ;) and meant "took one for the team")
No, he didn't. He meant "the Gipper". Since you don't have a TV, you
may have missed the fact that the latest attempt to fill Obama's empty
suit is to try to attach him to Reagan's coat tails. Really.
See, first he was Lincoln, then he was FDR, then he was (briefly)
Clinton. The Unicorn of Many Colors.
- Prev by Date: Re: Best comment from Judge Vinson's decision
- Next by Date: Re: Best comment from Judge Vinson's decision
- Previous by thread: Re: Beyond belief
- Next by thread: Re: Beyond belief