Re: [OT] The Huff calls B.S.!
- From: Mark Reinhold <markr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:14:45 -0800
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:49:07 -0800, Miss Elaine Eos
On 2010-12-31 23:43:24 -0800, Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
So I find it interesting
that zealots on either side can be so certain about a theory which has
neither been accepted as fact nor conclusively debunked.
The problem that Mickey and I have with the whole thing is that it *IS*
accepted as fact. International policy decisions are being made which
affect the lives of every person on the planet, becaue it's AGW is
accepted as fact.
...Well, that and because there's oodles of money to be made by
pretending that it's true.
Anyway, you forgot to share how you know. Please, enlighten us.
What we know for certain is that there is no solid science supporting
the idea of AGW. This does not prove that it is false but, like most
things, we tend not to believe the outlandish claims made by others
until they can provide something stronger than fear mongering, junk
science and repeated assertion.
Put another way: it's no more been proven false than psychic readings,
but we don't believe those, either.
can they provide a good cup of coffee?
Somewhere on the left coast
My Parole Officer says cigars calm me down
- Prev by Date: Re: The Huff calls B.S.!volcanic
- Next by Date: Re: Smoke one for...
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] The Huff calls B.S.!volcanic
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] The Huff calls B.S.!