Re: [OT] CCTV
- From: Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:14:47 -0700
On 2010-07-14 09:02:22 -0700, Ken Dixon <kdixon2711@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:I've been taking the stance that I believe there is a basic human need for some level of privacy, while my friend is suggesting that that's a learned thing, and people can be trained out of it in a generation or two.
Thoughts? Comments? Cites?
a) Your friend is a little scary.
He likes to explore the edges. While he *is* a little scary, I may have presented such a narrow side that he came across as more- or differently-so than is actually the case.
b) Yes privacy can be trained out. We do it to prison inmates all the time.
Right, but not without damaging them. That's my point. I'm saying that too much government intrusion (even subtle stuff like cameras on lamp-poles) weakens the society. "We didn't change the actual crime-rate, but we made every citizen into a prisoner" isn't really a win.
Misc "unless you're the Obama administration, but there are some who would contest the spin ;)"
Please remove your pants if you want to send me e-mail.
Lots of good cigar info, the ASC Birthday page, FAQs, vendors and more at
A "great" review is one with the name of the cigar before the review text in the body of the post. :)
- Re: [OT] CCTV
- From: Justin C
- Re: [OT] CCTV
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] CCTV
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Happy uh... yeah, whatever.
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] CCTV
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] CCTV