Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right

On 5/29/10 5:32 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
"Ken Dixon"<nsvmiami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:htrv06$gkq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/29/10 12:46 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
"Ken Dixon"<nsvmiami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:htr6lq$dld$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/29/10 7:31 AM, trogdor wrote:

"Paul M. Cook"<pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:htqeof$kfl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Ken Dixon"<nsvmiami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:htpgus$dac$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/28/10 6:19 PM, methuselah wrote:
On 5/28/2010 5:04 PM, Ken Dixon wrote:
On 5/28/10 2:56 PM, Tony wrote:

Sounds about right.

You left out the Mexican border where, if you're lucky, you are
arrested
and thrown into prison until they figure out what to do with you.

And, if you're not lucky, what happens?

Beat, robbed, disappeared.

So Ken, um, uh, from where do you derive this assumption? As I
understand it Mexico doesn't really have much of an illegal
immigration policy and they are pretty lax about people crossing their
borders. May I assume some Playboy centerfold on Fox News is the
source? I'll give you this, Fox can really pick some hot pieces of
ass. Have mercy. But that doesn't make them right.

Paul


the only ass is you

http://www.vdare.com/awall/070516_memo.htm

Providing Paul with links is a waste of effort, judging from his past
responses to them he never gets past the first sentence, assuming he
even
bothers with the link. It appears most of the time he just sees the
domain
and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, or as he likes to say
exaggerates for effect.

Probably because the domain is almost always WND.COM or FOXNEWS.COM or
NRA.COM or RUSHLIMBAUGH.COM or some other reliable and neutral source.

When anyone bothers to post anything that is.

Paul

--
Ken in Miami


Again, if the information is accurate the source is irrelevant.


I'd agree if they were not so dedicated to disseminating lies and other
falsehoods. That is their reason for existing in the first place.

Paul


Who specifically is "they"?

--
Ken in Miami
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right
    ... Providing Paul with links is a waste of effort, ... responses to them he never gets past the first sentence, ... and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, or as he likes to say ... When anyone bothers to post anything that is. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right
    ... May I assume some Playboy centerfold on Fox News is the ... responses to them he never gets past the first sentence, ... and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, ... When anyone bothers to post anything that is. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right
    ... responses to them he never gets past the first sentence, ... and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, or as he likes to say ... When anyone bothers to post anything that is. ... I heard you the first time. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right
    ... May I assume some Playboy centerfold on Fox News is the ... and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, or as he likes to say ... When anyone bothers to post anything that is. ... Ken in Miami ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: [OT] Let me see if I got this right
    ... May I assume some Playboy centerfold on Fox News is the ... and jumps to some insanely irrelevant conclusion, or as he likes to say ... When anyone bothers to post anything that is. ... Ken in Miami ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)