Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: "Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:10:59 +0100
On Tue, 18 May 2010 08:11:07 -0700, Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
On 2010-05-17 16:22:28 -0700, Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
"Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/17/2010 1:51 PM, Mickey wrote:
Yves Le Gal<flegal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:What data sources would that be?
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:35:11 -0500, Mickey<Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>No it's not, you're right. I'm speaking of consensus among historical
wrote:
but the existence of the historical Jesus is pretty much asConsensus amongst believers isn't scientific proof.
accepted as any other historical figure of that era.
scholars, who drew their data from sources outside the biblical
account.
Aside from Josephus's three sentence account (most likely a forgery in
copying from the original), there is NOTHING in historical records.
There certainly must be something there for the scholars to be
researching.
Thai hookers?
Back to ping pong balls, are we?
.
- References:
- OT: budget deficits
- From: Ken Dixon
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Tony
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Tony
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Tony
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Mickey
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Tony
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: CigarBaron
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Mickey
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Mickey
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Tom S.
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Mickey
- Re: OT: budget deficits
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- OT: budget deficits
- Prev by Date: Re: Oops!
- Next by Date: Re: OT: budget deficits
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: budget deficits
- Next by thread: Re: OT: budget deficits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|