Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Apr 2010 13:22:29 GMT
Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com> wrote in
news:hpu4fo$a8j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On 2010-04-11 15:56:08 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx> said:
It is simply not possible to reason with someone whose reasoner is
broken.
Can you prove that?
* A person whose reasoner is broken cannot reason (definition of
"broken.") * To reason with another person requires that the other
person be able to reason (definition of "with.")
* .: It is not possible to reason with someone whose reasoner is
broken (simple deduction.)
How'd I do, Bart? ;)
You've built him a fair trap. If he's convinced by your
reasoning, then he has to concede the point. If he's
not convinced by your reasoning, then we have more
evidence.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- References:
- Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Quake frequency normal.
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Quake frequency normal.
- Prev by Date: Re: American VAT?
- Next by Date: Re: American VAT?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quake frequency normal.
- Next by thread: Re: Quake frequency normal.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|