Re: Quake frequency normal.



Miss Elaine Eos <misc@*Your-pants*PlayNaked.com> wrote in
news:hpu4fo$a8j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On 2010-04-11 15:56:08 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx> said:

It is simply not possible to reason with someone whose reasoner is
broken.

Can you prove that?

* A person whose reasoner is broken cannot reason (definition of
"broken.") * To reason with another person requires that the other
person be able to reason (definition of "with.")
* .: It is not possible to reason with someone whose reasoner is
broken (simple deduction.)

How'd I do, Bart? ;)


You've built him a fair trap. If he's convinced by your
reasoning, then he has to concede the point. If he's
not convinced by your reasoning, then we have more
evidence.

--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
.