Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2010 20:48:23 GMT
"Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:hp08vn$amn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"Bart Goddard" <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9D4C94B48BC0goddardbenetscapenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Starvin Marvin <smarvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:310320101231591376%smarvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
In what way is being intentionally dishonest NOT lying?
No, it isn't a lie. It's just pushing buttons to expose the
reality of the situation. That's more along the lines of
manipulation for effect. But it's not lying and it is not
dishonest.
See guys? Paul gets it.
Wait. Paul just said that being intentionally dishonest
is not dishonest. And you assert that this is the "point".
Again, I think I see your problem.
Your problem is you selected text,
"My problem"? I don't have a problem. You, however,
have a serious problem. I quoted exactly what it took
to show that blatant contradictions rebound and crash
about in that empty head of yours to the point where
you can say absolutely any idiotic thing and think
you're pissin' gold.
Clearly, you called "dishonesty" not dishonest. You
simply can not (not even you) get any dumber than that.
You've hit rock bottom. Stop digging.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- References:
- OT: Buckethead dogs
- From: Starvin Marvin
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: trogdor
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Starvin Marvin
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: trogdor
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Starvin Marvin
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Starvin Marvin
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Paul M. Cook
- OT: Buckethead dogs
- Prev by Date: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Next by Date: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Previous by thread: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Next by thread: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|