Re: Buckethead dogs
- From: Starvin Marvin <smarvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:12:14 -0700
In article <slrnhr647n.dat.joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joe
On 2010-03-31, Paul M. Cook <pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Whaooooooaaaa now, Mary. You need to restate that. You have no basis for
that claim that I am not an ally. Maybe I am, maybe I am not. I have not
made any statements in this regard. But you do not know enough to *assume*
what you did. I do appreciate the friendly sentiment and would certainly
sit down with you for a meal and cigars but you are expressing your opinion
about what I think regards Marvin. Not fact. FWIW, I feel he would enjoy
socializing with you as well.
To be honest, I think you're probably right. I liked "Marvin" a lot
better in his original incarnation, when he wasn't trolling the group,
but even as Marvin, he wasn't so bad. He played a part, he had an
agenda, though he thoroughly misunderstood the results, I think.
I am pretty sure that the only reason that he was left to argue with
Misc is because everyone else tended to ignore him, while Ted just
seems to love to argue a point until his fingers bleed on the
keyboard, even when he might not believe in what he's arguing.
A thoughtful and reasonable response. That's all I ask for.
As I wrote in my original post for this thread, that's the same
conclusion with Miss Elaine Eos that I came to.
Marvin, really the best thing (IMO) is just to go back to the old,
original nym, and move on as if you never "left"...
My thought exactly,..after The Usual Suspects' blood pressures come
back down. 8^)
- Prev by Date: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Buckethead dogs
- Previous by thread: Re: Buckethead dogs
- Next by thread: Re: Buckethead dogs