Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: "Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:42:08 -0700
On 2/1/2010 11:57 PM, Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
On 2010-02-01 17:30:17 -0800, "Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> said:Warren Buffet makes 8-11% a year over a five year average.
They're dependent on growth rates that are absurd, particularly in future economies. For instance, Colorado's PARA is based on 8% annual growth in perpetuity.
(a) What does that have to do with in/out of line with other pensions?!
(b) If your fund can't make 10% consistently (10 yr moving average) on 100s of Ms of $$$, you need to kick your fund manager in the nuts. It's a bit harder with only $1M, but still easy to make 7-8%, even for us amateurs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Alex W
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- References:
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Tom S.
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Tom S.
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Tom S.
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Have you ANY IDEA what it costs...?!
- Next by Date: Re: Canadian Health Care - not good enough for the elite.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Part of California's (and everyone else's) Problem
- Index(es):